Successfully Responding to a USCIS Notice of Intent to Deny

---

Immigration law is a complex field that demands precision, honesty, and expert guidance. Recently, a client approached me seeking assistance in responding to a USCIS Notice of Intent to Deny (NOID) regarding his wife's Green Card application. The intricacies of their case highlight the critical importance of consulting an immigration attorney and maintaining full disclosure in all dealings with the U.S. government. For additional insight, visit the USCIS website.

Background

The client's wife entered the United States on a B1/B2 visa. During her visa interview, she did not disclose that she was married to a U.S. citizen. Acting on misguided advice that marrying in the U.S. would lend their union more credibility, the couple, who are first cousins, married again in Pennsylvania following her arrival. Subsequently, they filed for adjustment of status for the wife's Green Card application.

Complications

USCIS flagged the case for multiple reasons:

• Undisclosed Marriage: The wife failed to disclose her existing marriage during her B1/B2 visa interview.
• Second Marriage Legality: Their marriage in Pennsylvania was considered illegal and against public policy due to their cousin's relationship.
• Misrepresentation and Fraud: The wife's omission during her visa interview resulted in accusations of misrepresentation and fraud.

Our Approach

Upon reviewing the case, we recognized the legal and factual complexities at play. Our strategy concentrated on clarifying the wife's intentions and the legal standing of their original marriage in their home country.

Clarifying Intentions:

• In their culture, they often view the initial marriage ceremony, "Katab Ktiab," as an engagement. This cultural misunderstanding led the wife to believe she was merely engaged during her visa interview.
• Honest Mistake: We argued that her failure to disclose was not a deliberate act of deceit, but rather a genuine misunderstanding of her marital status stemming from cultural differences.

Legal Marriage Validity:

• Home Country Marriage: We emphasized that their home country legally bound their marriage and that USCIS should acknowledge it.
• Invalid Pennsylvania Marriage: Although their Pennsylvania marriage was invalid because of their cousin's relationship, it did not invalidate their initial marriage.

Outcome:

We successfully demonstrated that the wife did not intend to commit misrepresentation or fraud by providing a detailed explanation and supporting evidence. USCIS accepted our arguments, recognizing the cultural nuances and legal validity of the initial marriage. Consequently, the wife's Green Card application is now under process.

Lessons Learned

This case serves as a crucial reminder of several important points in immigration law:

• Full Disclosure: Always be truthful in all communications with the U.S. government. Omissions or misstatements, whether intentional or not, can lead to severe repercussions.
• Cultural Sensitivity: Understand and convey the cultural context that may affect an applicant's understanding and decisions.
• Expert Guidance: Immigration law is intricate and unforgiving. Always seek the guidance of an experienced immigration attorney instead of relying on unqualified advice.

Final Thoughts

Honesty and expert legal advice are essential when navigating the U.S. immigration system. This case illustrates the potential pitfalls of misunderstanding or failing to disclose one's circumstances. If you encounter immigration issues, consult a qualified immigration lawyer to ensure your application is managed correctly and efficiently.

For those addressing immigration matters, remember that honesty is the best policy, and expert immigration law guidance is invaluable. Do not allow unqualified advice to jeopardize your future—consult an immigration attorney to navigate the complexities of the law.

Call us at 412-292-9262 or get in touch.